larryhammer: drawing of a wildhaired figure dancing, label: "La!" (La!)
[personal profile] larryhammer
Now HERE's a glory of a poetic train-wreck: King Arthur, an epic by Edward Bulwer Lytton -- yes, that Bulwer Lytton. Rarely have I seen so much antiquarian erudition yoked to so much twaddle.

The sad thing is, BL -- if I may call him that -- knows how to turn a competent line of poetry: his meter is fluid, rhymes rarely jar, he rarely jumps metaphors mid-maneuver. His diction tends a little on the forsoothy side, but that's somewhat to be expected given the topic and time. You have to read a while to grasp how bad this stuff is. He seems to have particular difficulty with transitions. And antecedents. And antecedents around transitions. And pacing. And consistent characterization. And keeping his obsession with medieval Welsh history and culture from overloading his story. And with keeping his story within the bounds of plausibility. If BL was retelling a story from the Arthurian tradition, this last wouldn't matter as much -- but no, instead it's equal parts historical novel about the Saxon invasion of Britain and a high fantasy complete with prophecies and plot coupons, neither of which has more than the most tenuous relationship to existing Arthuriana.

In short, it makes no sense. At all.

Which means there's quite a bit of entertainment to be had if you give up all expectations of rational storytelling. I am especially amused by how slashy the narration gets any time Arthur is alone with another man. Not just Lancelot, either -- it's even more noticeable with old man Merlin, who has loved the King since he was a boy. (Er, deciding to use BL for short was ENTIRELY a coincidence here. But hilarious in hindsight.)

Fair warning: I haven't finished this, so it's entirely possible that coherence may show up before it's all over. But I'd bet against it.

([livejournal.com profile] rushthatspeaks, was it you who mentioned this thing, a few years ago? Because I've lost track of where I found out about it.)

---L.

Date: 10 June 2012 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com
Bulwer-Lytton is a fascinating character. Trollope, in his autobio, considers him one of the greats of the century, along with Dickens, Elliott, Thackeray, and Collins, if I remember aright.

And considering how much influence he had! I still am considering a post about bad books that have enormous influence.

Date: 10 June 2012 09:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com
I'm still prowling around it, trying to find a way in past the pitfalls.

Date: 10 June 2012 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] movingfinger.livejournal.com
Maybe this was the poetry implied as used for the libretto in The Lyre of Orpheus? Not that Davies wasn't capable of throwing a red herring or seven out there and just Making Shit Up because that's what writers are supposed to do.

Date: 10 June 2012 11:56 pm (UTC)
ext_27060: Sumer is icomen in; llude sing cucu! (Default)
From: [identity profile] rymenhild.livejournal.com
I mentioned it, I'm pretty sure. It struck me as the kind of thing you'd enjoy. (While writhing in agony.)

Date: 11 June 2012 04:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desperance.livejournal.com
Heh. I met his great-grandson! (Or similar.) He showed us around the family pile (Knebworth House), and it was all "Charles Dickens performed on these stairs" and "those gargoyles? Added by my great-grandfather to make the place more Gothic..."

Date: 12 June 2012 04:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rushthatspeaks.livejournal.com
Not me, as I've never heard of it. And am now highly entertained. It's actually possible to argue for Bulwer-Lytton as at least a decent novelist in a style nobody likes nowadays, but this, not so much.

August 2025

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456 789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 10 August 2025 11:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios