Despite my claims
10 August 2003 10:20 amA couple months ago, in a discussion in someone else's LJ, I explained how much work it would take to create by hand an RSS feed of my web log, eventually concluding that it wasn't worth the effort.
Some of you are already snickering. Stop that.
Larry's Pretty Good Web Log is now syndicated for news aggregators. We'll see how long till LJ notices it.
I said stop snickering.
---L.
Some of you are already snickering. Stop that.
Larry's Pretty Good Web Log is now syndicated for news aggregators. We'll see how long till LJ notices it.
I said stop snickering.
---L.
no subject
Date: 10 August 2003 05:38 pm (UTC)And I would probably do a lot less snickering if you explained how you set up the RSS to begin with.
no subject
Date: 11 August 2003 08:53 am (UTC)<tinker tinker ... >
---L.
no subject
Date: 11 August 2003 04:42 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 11 August 2003 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 11 August 2003 04:39 pm (UTC)All LiveJournals are also automatically published as RSS, and you can read many non-LJ RSS feeds by adding them to your Friends—by some mechanism that LucyAnne understands but I don't. Which nicely segues to
I followed these instructions, supplimented by this. I'm using v0.91 because all aggregators "know" it and is the simplest to write. Because my log entries don't have titles, I use the date as the title; the link is the permalink to the archived entry and the description is the text of the entry without any a-links. The latter because I'd have to escape it, and that's too much work when editing in Notepad; if someone wants to learn what links I'm posting, they can follow to the entry and then click through.
So schema of directory structure: main directory is all the main pages; subdirectory Log has log.html, a series of log archive files going back four years, and lpgwl.xml. The last is my RSS feed.
Make sense?
---L.
Thanks
Date: 12 August 2003 11:41 am (UTC)Re: Thanks
Date: 12 August 2003 02:38 pm (UTC)---L.