Something that got cut in the final round from the new hundred poems project. Not because it's not good, but because I already had Hero and Leander and Orchestra and didn't have "The Fairies Farewell."
Ovid's Banquest of Sense* (text starts here) by George Chapman is a very odd duck. It is, essentially an Elizabethan Ovid/Julia the Elder Historical RPF in verse. What's odder than all that, however, is that is both highly sensuous, dealing with a seduction organized by treating each of the canonical five senses in turn, and strongly metaphysical, with passages that but for the meter could almost have been written by Donne. It is also highly erotic, though the story breaks off before the seduction is consummated (darn it).
All of which ought to clearly make it an Ovidian erotic narrative. But it does not fit well among others of the genre, most notably because it's Ovidian by being about Ovid rather than imitating him. It is also strikingly more original than most, Hero and Leander being its best rival in that regard.
I do wish it were better known.
* Don't be put off by the title -- in modern idiom, it would be "banquet of the senses." The Elizabethan orthography of the only text I can find online is, however, understandably rebarbative.
---L.
Ovid's Banquest of Sense* (text starts here) by George Chapman is a very odd duck. It is, essentially an Elizabethan Ovid/Julia the Elder Historical RPF in verse. What's odder than all that, however, is that is both highly sensuous, dealing with a seduction organized by treating each of the canonical five senses in turn, and strongly metaphysical, with passages that but for the meter could almost have been written by Donne. It is also highly erotic, though the story breaks off before the seduction is consummated (darn it).
All of which ought to clearly make it an Ovidian erotic narrative. But it does not fit well among others of the genre, most notably because it's Ovidian by being about Ovid rather than imitating him. It is also strikingly more original than most, Hero and Leander being its best rival in that regard.
I do wish it were better known.
* Don't be put off by the title -- in modern idiom, it would be "banquet of the senses." The Elizabethan orthography of the only text I can find online is, however, understandably rebarbative.
---L.
no subject
Date: 29 April 2012 01:50 pm (UTC)the text wasn't as odd as the format, and how many clicks it took to find the poem. Lovely! But I don't think as brilliant as Donne
no subject
Date: 29 April 2012 04:27 pm (UTC)No, not as brilliant as Donne at his compactest best. But comparable to anything Donne wrote at length, I think. As I said, and odd duck.
---L.
no subject
Date: 30 April 2012 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 30 April 2012 01:10 am (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 30 April 2012 08:19 pm (UTC)Any man who writes a poem featuring a pair of giant breasts with flashing lights on top, in the 17c, is obviously ahead of his time.
What? It's right here:
(Freckles, even. That's so cute of him.)
no subject
Date: 30 April 2012 11:56 pm (UTC)The whole poem has lush bits to boggle at, if you look closely. There's more further on, in the scent section that still has me scratching my head.
---L.
no subject
Date: 1 May 2012 12:20 am (UTC)See how heroically I refrain from a sniff-and scratch-your-head joke! See!
no subject
Date: 1 May 2012 02:39 am (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 1 May 2012 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 30 April 2012 01:43 am (UTC)And here I thought all this time that Ovid was just a town in Colorado.
Learn something every day (though sometimes it's got to be pounded into my head like dry sand into a rat hole, in the Oklahoma Panhandle…).
no subject
Date: 30 April 2012 02:29 pm (UTC)---L.