Matching form to function
14 May 2007 07:12 am It's not like designers at Penguin Classics are lacking
the knowledge
Of how to handle hexameters. Why then their failure
to use it
In Raeburn's recent translation of Metamorphoses?
On an average page, there's barely three verses that's
typeset within
A single line, with all others continued with vast
indent—
And most roving over a single word. The pages are
ugly,
Everything awkward to read. The font size is generous,
though,
So why not reduce it a point and gather more verses
together?
Nor does it help that the poem is written in thumping
sub-Longfellow,
With all of the beats but now with just one third the
sonority—
Dietetically versed. Avoid this volume. Feh, and more
feh.
---L.
the knowledge
Of how to handle hexameters. Why then their failure
to use it
In Raeburn's recent translation of Metamorphoses?
On an average page, there's barely three verses that's
typeset within
A single line, with all others continued with vast
indent—
And most roving over a single word. The pages are
ugly,
Everything awkward to read. The font size is generous,
though,
So why not reduce it a point and gather more verses
together?
Nor does it help that the poem is written in thumping
sub-Longfellow,
With all of the beats but now with just one third the
sonority—
Dietetically versed. Avoid this volume. Feh, and more
feh.
---L.
no subject
Date: 14 May 2007 03:26 pm (UTC)this is too funny.
at least they give you margins, sounds like. I picked up a paperback--not poetry, admittedly--that went to within less than a quarter of an inch of the paper, and down into the gutter in the center. Why? Why???
but yeah, unnecessarily ugly, that Penguin.
no subject
Date: 14 May 2007 03:56 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 14 May 2007 04:17 pm (UTC)word
down on the next line, just as you indicated in your little
review.
It's like a badly formatted e-mail or something. But great cover art. And wide margins.
no subject
Date: 14 May 2007 04:27 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 14 May 2007 06:36 pm (UTC)and heh.
We don't got to show you no steenkin' type design
Date: 15 May 2007 01:40 am (UTC)-- Brian out --
Re: We don't got to show you no steenkin' type design
Date: 15 May 2007 01:44 am (UTC)---L.