A fingersmith from Southwark
9 October 2005 09:10 amFingersmith by Sarah Waters is a delicious novel -- a heady mixture of Victorian novel, gothic, and thriller, with a touch of caper thrown in for good measure. And the prose -- mmm. Slow-moving in a Victorian way but so smooth it carries you downstream until you're caught up in the slow-motion emotional train-wreck -- and then Waters springs the first plot twist and you go "Aigh!" This happens only one-third in, and it's at this point you realize you're not on a river-boat or a train, but a roller-coaster.
I especially like the reveal of what Maud's life was really like, tearing down everything Sue had built up, and why this made her fall in love with Sue. The next big reveal, of Sue's true mother, was obvious the moment we returned to Lant Street, and I'd been suspecting they'd go there ever since leaving the madhouse. And with that revealed, Maud's true mother was really obvious, so it didn't have the impact Waters wanted. But that point, I didn't care, because I wanted to find out how we'd survive all this -- or even, what happens next.
Which happening is excellent ... except. Um. Mrs. Sucksby's plot doesn't make sense. No matter which way I unpack its loops, it involves at least three double-crosses, and that's before it started falling apart and she had to improvise. And it's not because Waters can't plot. For example: that Sucksby is Maud's mother was crucial to the book's plot, because otherwise Sucksby wouldn't have taken the fall for Maud. And taking the fall only worked because Sucksby had hit John just before, making him finger her. And that only worked because Gentleman had found a new boy to play with (that was a nice reveal, btw). Which only worked ... and so on. Waters' plot stacks up, dovetailing all together. But not Mrs. Sucksby's plan(s).
Very odd. Very good. I want to reread it. Because, after all, love calls us to the things of the world -- but first, I have some advice for a prophet to read.
---L.
I especially like the reveal of what Maud's life was really like, tearing down everything Sue had built up, and why this made her fall in love with Sue. The next big reveal, of Sue's true mother, was obvious the moment we returned to Lant Street, and I'd been suspecting they'd go there ever since leaving the madhouse. And with that revealed, Maud's true mother was really obvious, so it didn't have the impact Waters wanted. But that point, I didn't care, because I wanted to find out how we'd survive all this -- or even, what happens next.
Which happening is excellent ... except. Um. Mrs. Sucksby's plot doesn't make sense. No matter which way I unpack its loops, it involves at least three double-crosses, and that's before it started falling apart and she had to improvise. And it's not because Waters can't plot. For example: that Sucksby is Maud's mother was crucial to the book's plot, because otherwise Sucksby wouldn't have taken the fall for Maud. And taking the fall only worked because Sucksby had hit John just before, making him finger her. And that only worked because Gentleman had found a new boy to play with (that was a nice reveal, btw). Which only worked ... and so on. Waters' plot stacks up, dovetailing all together. But not Mrs. Sucksby's plan(s).
Very odd. Very good. I want to reread it. Because, after all, love calls us to the things of the world -- but first, I have some advice for a prophet to read.
---L.