Amusements
16 May 2005 06:02 pmIn general, I don't believe in external Muses. "In general," because because my pagan tendencies vary with the wind's direction -- or perhaps it's by bathetometric pressure. I do profess to worry the Muses will someday wreck retribution for my ribald account of their contest with the Pierides (a poem still unsold, darn it -- anyone want to publish 150 lines of Ovid as acted out by cheerleaders?) but this is mostly joking.
But their internal existence, oh yes indeed. Muse is the perfect label for a mental state: when a prepared creative mind, seeded with knowledge and sown with craft, creates something from nothing -- as if what comes out is breathed through one by some other entity. Not all creativity comes that way -- sometimes it's mechanical crafting, or slogging through sloughs of apathy. But the white-hot inspiration -- when it flows, when you're in the zone, when it's you and your creation and oh yeah somewhere around here there may be a real life but never mind that -- there's no feeling like it, and no easy description except by metaphor, so why not symbol it already?
Until recently, my Muse went unnamed. Not that I know her name now, but following
beth_bernobich and
ogre_san, I've started calling her Fred. It's more concrete, if nothing else. Fred, like most Muses, is a capricious elf, but she's fun company when she drops in.
All this longwindedness, by way of preface to a poll. O ye who create, be ye writers, artists, musicians, or flower arrangers manqué -- what is your existential take on Muses?
---L.
But their internal existence, oh yes indeed. Muse is the perfect label for a mental state: when a prepared creative mind, seeded with knowledge and sown with craft, creates something from nothing -- as if what comes out is breathed through one by some other entity. Not all creativity comes that way -- sometimes it's mechanical crafting, or slogging through sloughs of apathy. But the white-hot inspiration -- when it flows, when you're in the zone, when it's you and your creation and oh yeah somewhere around here there may be a real life but never mind that -- there's no feeling like it, and no easy description except by metaphor, so why not symbol it already?
Until recently, my Muse went unnamed. Not that I know her name now, but following
All this longwindedness, by way of preface to a poll. O ye who create, be ye writers, artists, musicians, or flower arrangers manqué -- what is your existential take on Muses?
---L.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 01:56 am (UTC)The rest of the time you have to set fingers to keyboard and struggle.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 03:51 am (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 03:52 am (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 03:55 am (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 04:10 am (UTC)But, I know the muse. I just don't call it a "muse".
May the muse be with you.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 06:19 am (UTC)In Ancient Rome (oh gawd, there she goes again!) one's "creative spirit" was known as the genius for males or iuno for females. I am not sure if the Romans would agree with "iuno" pulling double duty as a muse, as all nine were accounted for with names of their own, and Juno was already pretty booked as well, but seeing as the Classical Romans are all dead, perhaps I shall call my muse Eugenia (ay-oo-gay-nee-ah), very loosely "true spirit of creation." "Well-bred" to those with less imagination. A lovely name in concept, but kind of stuffy sounding. I think it suits her as I find her to be a bit of a tight wad with the inspiration, and somewhat of a sourpuss. (Gosh, I hope she doesn't read this!) I don't know where she is tonight, but it's not here with me, that's for sure.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 06:51 am (UTC)I can't give my Muses names, though. Something tells me if I did, they'd leave.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 06:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 02:12 pm (UTC)It's not that she's shy, exactly--but she does like to imagine she's not been seen.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 02:21 pm (UTC)Is this considered an alternate creative life style?
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 02:24 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 02:25 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 02:26 pm (UTC)I can respect that.
---L.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 02:27 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 03:07 pm (UTC)even non-writers have muses or muse friendly qualities
Date: 17 May 2005 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 11:51 pm (UTC)---L.
Unfair!
Date: 17 May 2005 11:54 pm (UTC)How does one recognize muse spoor anyway? And what's the technical name, anyway?
---L.
no subject
Date: 17 May 2005 11:57 pm (UTC)That was the comic you wanted, right?
no subject
Date: 18 May 2005 12:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 May 2005 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 May 2005 01:58 am (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 18 May 2005 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 May 2005 12:02 am (UTC)I like that phrasing. I haven't named my Muse or Goddess although I definitely have felt her presence. As you may have read in a recent post of mine, I've also lived through a time when she was smothered under psychoactive chemicals, and I hope *never* to experience that kind of "bereftness" again! On the whole, she and I are partners: I'm her hands, she's my heart, and I'm grateful for the relationship.
no subject
Date: 19 May 2005 02:10 pm (UTC)---L.
Re: Unfair!
Date: 20 May 2005 04:47 pm (UTC)integrated muses....
Date: 24 May 2005 05:21 pm (UTC)Re: integrated muses....
Date: 24 May 2005 10:48 pm (UTC)---L.