(no subject)
29 January 2005 08:39 amAfter a dozen Heyers and a couple other Regencies in the past three weeks, I find myself wanting to read the Tough Guide to Regencyshire:
Do not be alarmed at the number of PERSONS who greet you on your arrival. They are only there to introduce you to the initial problem through conversation, and only one or two will take part in your ADVENTURE. However, you are obligated to keep the Persons and all their relationships straight, as most of them will be referred to in the course of affairs. In particular, the VACUOUS EGOIST will act as a foil for some part of your Adventure, but not be the focus of action, unless they are a BEAUTIFUL YOUNG LADY.Except, of course, that applies only to the district of Heyerton. Any other entries we should make note of?
---L.
no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 05:32 pm (UTC)---L.
DARK BYRONIC MAN
Date: 29 January 2005 04:53 pm (UTC)Re: DARK BYRONIC MAN
Date: 29 January 2005 05:33 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 05:04 pm (UTC)Or rather,
*faints artistically onto the sopha*
no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 05:55 pm (UTC)You may like Robins's new Regency mysteries, starting with Point of Honor, which are really alternate history hardboiled female detective novels wrapped in Regency clothing. Heyer writes Chandler.
I'm holding some early Jo Beverleys in reserve, from before she started writing Regency Historicals (though I don't know if they're still called that).
---L.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 23 February 2005 04:53 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Edith Layton
From:Re: Edith Layton
From:ALMACK'S
Date: 29 January 2005 05:51 pm (UTC)Once you are actually admitted within these doors (be sure to arrive before eleven!), you may wonder what all the fuss is about. Certainly your fellow guests will be at pains to complain about the tedium of the company, the refreshments, and the music. No matter. After you have stopped at ALMACK'S, you are free to proceed to the more entertaining venues of a RIDOTTO, VAUXHALL, or possibly a MASKED BALL. A lady who has been to Almack's can do anything she wants to. Patrons of our tours generally take full advantage of that liberty.
You are not allowed to WALTZ until you have been given approval by a patroness. Again, none of our patrons has ever been denied this permission.
If you are a WITTY SKEPTICAL LADY, you may begin to wonder whether our Tour has a financial arrangement with the Patronesses. We recommend that such ladies save their wit and skepticism for the EROTIC MATCH.
Re: ALMACK'S
Date: 29 January 2005 05:56 pm (UTC)---L.
Re: ALMACK'S
From:Re: ALMACK'S
From:no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 8 February 2005 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 07:35 pm (UTC)WARNING: Do not sign up to be a Governess in BRONTEVILLE. There are no FRENCH GOWNS or AL FRESCO PIC-NICS for Governesses in Bronteville. The HERO will be the VICTORIAN BYRONIC MODEL who is extremely high maintenance, and you will be expected to WORK like a DRUDGE until your VIRTUE rewards you with RESPETABILITY along with the VICTORIAN BYRONIC MODEL, who will by then be BLIND, DRUNK, OR MAIMED.
no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 09:53 pm (UTC)---L.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Appropriate places to be a governess
From:Re: Appropriate places to be a governess
From:MONEY
Date: 29 January 2005 09:07 pm (UTC)Re: MONEY
Date: 29 January 2005 10:26 pm (UTC)---L.
Re: MONEY
From:Re: MONEY
From:no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 09:55 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 29 January 2005 10:25 pm (UTC)Other ignorable styles which have gone out of fashion incude lace NECKCLOTHS and cuffs, brocade DRESSES, and wigs. If you encounter any of these, the appropriate response is a faint embarrassment at the failings of taste in your ELDERS.
---L.
no subject
Date: 30 January 2005 12:48 am (UTC)---L.
SEX
Date: 30 January 2005 05:12 am (UTC)There is no SEX whatever in Heyerton or Austenville. Something embarrassing must happen to produce BABIES, but the details remain obscure. Notwithstanding this lacuna, any young lady who is alone with a young gentleman will be suspected of having done something impermissible. Married ladies may feel free to speculate on the parentage of other married ladies' children; their own always bear a strong resemblance to their dear Papa.
If you nonetheless wish to partake of SEX, we suggest booking a somewhat racier TOUR. Discretion remains mandatory; if you are discovered to have enjoyed SEX, you may find yourself unable to attend parties until your hasty and clandestine MARRIAGE.
Re: SEX
Date: 4 February 2005 05:15 pm (UTC)Should you choose (chuse) to marry while in Regencyshire, you must not, under any circumstances, go the regular route and have the BANNS read. Indeed, if you are not planning to ELOPE on the GREAT NORTH ROAD to GRETNA GREEN, your EROTIC MATCH is obliged to obtain a SPECIAL LICENSE from the Archbishop of Canterbury, so that you may be married within three days. Naturally, if you had to wait three weeks for the BANNS to be read, some DIAMOND OF THE FIRST WATER will doubtless come and snatch your BUCK out from under your very nose, and it will only be your own fault.
Beauty
From:Babies
From:Re: Babies
From:Re: Babies
From:Re: Babies
From:Re: Babies
From:Re: SEX
From:Re: SEX
From:no subject
Date: 31 January 2005 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 9 February 2005 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 4 February 2005 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 4 February 2005 08:00 pm (UTC)Stand and deliver their titles. I should warn you I'm a fair shot with this. (q.v. HIGHWAYMEN)
---L.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:flinging books
From:Re: flinging books
From:no subject
Date: 4 February 2005 10:27 pm (UTC)ROFL!
no subject
Date: 4 February 2005 11:39 pm (UTC)I beg your pardon, madame, but did we disturb you?
---L.
no subject
Date: 5 February 2005 03:19 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 5 February 2005 07:30 pm (UTC)Meanwhile, the entry on Conduct ends:
But while you act as you wish, despite the disapproval of those with PROPRIETY, without damaging your character, beware doing anything that may cause your EROTIC MATCH to give you a thundering set-downOMT, for it is bound cast you into the hipsOMT, if not give you a freakish distemperOMT. If this should last for more than a few days, it will be time to own up that you do indeed cherish his REGARD, and possibly that you have loved him all this timeOMT.
---L.
Even if...
Date: 13 February 2005 06:33 pm (UTC)Re: Even if...
Date: 14 February 2005 02:23 pm (UTC)---L.
Naval Officers...
Date: 15 February 2005 10:28 pm (UTC)Do not confuse a Naval Officer with a Naval SURGEON, unless your ability to drive a COACH AND FOUR is entirely genuine.
MIDSHIPMEN should be given the respect due to a YOUNGER BROTHER.
Seamen may be either ROGUES or TRUSTED SERVANTS. They may take both roles at the same time and, while famously less than competent with horses, have HEARTS OF OAK which become apparent in a TIGHT SPOT.
Re: Naval Officers...
Date: 15 February 2005 11:37 pm (UTC)LOL!
---L.
no subject
Date: 18 February 2005 12:27 am (UTC)Bravo for this compilation!
no subject
Date: 18 February 2005 02:40 pm (UTC)The preference for army officers we can partially lay blame on the conditions in Austendale. Even though the denisens ultimately prefered the navy.
---L.
no subject
Date: 5 March 2005 08:21 pm (UTC)Unless your OFFICER is the second son of a noble line, we suggest looking elsewhere. NAVAL CAPTAINS are always an excellent choice; by the time they engage in courtship they are generally SUFFICIENTLY ENDOWED. (Do not see TIGHT HUSSAR PANTS; the Management isn't talking about that.)
no subject
Date: 6 March 2005 02:36 pm (UTC)---L.
Tutorial for Children Other than the Eldest Male
Date: 12 March 2005 03:10 am (UTC)To forestall your examination of your inclinations and skills, let us immediately lay out the only careers that younger sons of the gentry may pursue:
* Cleric
* Army officer
* Naval officer (assuming you joined at age 10 or thereabouts)
* Diplomacy
Do not blanche at the thought of becoming a CLERIC; no one would be so indelicate as to inquire about your relationship with Jesus. There are no canting Methodists in Regencyland. The Church is frequently a refuge for scholarly blokes who like their Greek and Latin. But fear not: there's always room for twits. Do not make the mistake, however, of entering this profession without first ascertaining that some friend or relative can provide you with a living or a chaplaincy. That were madness, when the whole point of this exercise is to earn your keep.
Likewise, do not enter the Army unless someone can buy your way into the officer's rank. True, during wartime you will have a chance to rise by your own efforts, but you have a great chance of dying in battle, which would affect your long-range plans. The same caution applies to joining the Navy, but you may not have a choice if your parents send you packing when you're scarcely out of shortcoats.
If your father has sufficient influence, he may be able to get you a diplomatic posting, where you will spend the rest of your life carting papers from one place to another for people much more educated and intelligent than you.
All in all, your best choice is to marry an heiress, though unless you are possessed of exceptional charm, there's not the slightest reason why an heiress should marry you. Failing that, you may as well spend your time walking backwards to Brighton, riding your horse through inns, and punting on tick with anyone unwise enough to extend you credit until the day when tipstaffs cart you off to debtor's prison.
NOTE: If you are very bad (but over the age of being put in the Navy), your parents may banish you to India, where you may safely partake of trade and make your fortune, as long as you do not refer to it when you return to England to share your wealth with your loving family. No gentleman ever takes part in merchantly transactions, except at extreme distance.
If you are a female, your choices are even more limited. You may become a governess or a hired companion. You could also drown yourself in the horse pond, but it's not good ton, however preferable it may be to enduring brats on both ends of life. Spending a fortune on clothes, not to mention distilled water of green pineapples and crushed strawberries for your complexion, may be your best investment, for you may induce some punch-addled gentleman into proposing marriage, which you should immediately accept and make public to prevent his coming to his senses befoer the knot is duly tied. It would be bad to be married to a disagreeable man, but as Elizabeth Watson of the outskirts of AUSTENVILLE says, "I do not think there are many disagreeable men." Such it seems when career options are few.
You could also become a novelist. Why, only think of Fanny Burney, who sold her first novel for 20 pounds! Perhaps we had best not think of her.
In Regencyland, one doesn't EARN money; one HAS money. This makes perfect sense in an economy where nothing is made, except clothes by one's tailor or modiste. The tenants do something with crops, but in the background, where peasants belong. Something with money happens in the City, but we don't know what, for no gentleman ever goes there. Have another ice at Gunther's, and don't trouble your pretty head about such things.